data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3734/b3734000d004a1154ad10e571fad8f36e1508991" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a961e/a961e051e7b57f31cc5b64122f26715631325ba0" alt=""
It should be famous for the quality of the writing, the humour and the incredibly moving chapter regarding the Hillsborough nightmare, but it’s mostly about a sad wee football fanatic who can’t keep a girl.
Hornby’s style keeps his work from falling easily into transparent genres. More importantly the book vindicates the unrequited love people like us (I mean geeks like me ’n him at least) have for something as ungiving as a football team. It allows us to get away with justifying the irrational. (Almost). It provides depth and meaning to our resentment of the phrase “it’s only a game.”
Unless, of course, you’re this guy…ESPN Soccernet's review of Fever Pitch. Sean didn’t do enough research and read the book with a preconceived agenda in mind and I think kind of missed most of the point as a result. Still I’m glad he liked it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3e93/f3e9333918358f98aaccf518c2f7f2e8a6b975a2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa495/fa49504799ca8dc87ac012fc029533f907536937" alt=""
For a stiff English man playing a stiff English man, Colin Firth did reasonably well. The US version with Drew Barrymore and Jimmy Fallon (another SNL movie flopper) had to be baseball to make it more, I dunno…accessible? It smells like shite, primarily because it is.
As a writer myself, or at least someone aspiring to make a living from the written word, I have to commend Hornby for doing it, getting away with it and keeping on doing it. Not too many authors have managed a film from a book let alone two. Even fewer writers have been responsible for two large scoops of celluloid poo and maintained as much authorial credibility as he has. I think it's because he’s a decent bloke and a great writer.
I’ve been told that one of the secrets of Hornby’s success, particularly his earlier ostensibly boys books, Fever Pitch, High Fidelity and About A Boy,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc93b/dc93bd55fcb174812caad20d7519f0af7a640bd6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3730a/3730aa0d5e759ad2d8690e1543e6495e707fe7d7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51de6/51de64f01b03e58bc48a1f91380b0bceee2b8387" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99a6f/99a6f42cf1e6fd87f66230b7bb5ba3796f930fdf" alt=""
Nick Hornby has been held responsible for the initial breath of life given by the now bloated corpse of ‘lad’ lit. To me Fever Pitch was always more than that though, it was the book that helped me, and a lot of others I'd imagine, realise football writing, something far more durable than a notional category, can be literary. Of course, I then read McIlvanney, Walvin, White and Davies and found that people had been writing football literature long before Hornby, but he opened the door, he seemed to make it easier to get the ‘it’ of literary football fiction. I’m grateful he did.
2 comments:
I'm a chick, and to date all I've read of Hornby is Long Way Down, a cheery tale about suicide. I actually quite liked it - particularly Hornby's style.
I also liked the film adaptation of About a boy, and your blog has reminded me that I want to read more of his stuff, especially High Fidelity, which I've heard so many good things about.
And yes, the two film versions of Fever Pitch were shite on their own merits, let alone in comparison with the novel.
Aye High Fidelity is a cracker.
So's About A Boy. The one you've read is probably his weakest effort I think.
What about the polysyllabic spree? There's some great stuff in there.
I'll see ye oan the twelth eh?
Post a Comment